Intentional Leader

  • Home
  • Podcast
  • Course
  • Newsletters
  • Articles
  • About
  • Patreon
  • Contact

Shepherding Souls to Safety: 3 Ways to Foster Psychological Safety in the Modern Workplace

September 16, 2022 by Cal Walters in Organizational Leadership

By: Ryan Brence

“There are two kinds of people in the world. One walks into a room and says, “There you are!” The other walks into a room and says, “Here I am!”
— Abigail Van Buren

Have you ever dreaded attending a meeting due to the fear or anxiety of how you or your thoughts & opinions would be judged by the leader?

It seems like a rhetorical question because I know most, if not all of us, would respond with a resounding YES.

For me, this took place on a weekly basis over the course of a year during my time as an executive officer in the Army.

The brutal “Maintenance Monday” meeting…

Each week, I would be charged with reporting the status updates of millions of dollars worth of equipment within my respective unit. This included the repair or replacement of parts needed for multiple weapons systems, armored vehicles, and miscellaneous operational equipment.

While the responsibility and importance of my unit’s preparedness was not lost on me, I oftentimes had a hard time fully understanding the faults and breakdowns associated with the equipment.

Let’s just say that I’m not the most mechanically inclined…

However, with that being said, I would show up to “Maintenance Monday” meetings prepared to report on my unit’s equipment after having multiple conversations with my company’s operators and mechanics. 

The soldiers I worked with would explain the faults to me in great detail by showing me the specific breakdowns and reviewing each problem with me in the corresponding equipment manuals. Then, I would do my very best to explain the issues to my superior officer in our weekly meetings. 

Regardless of how prepared I felt, more often than not I would leave those meetings feeling frustrated, embarrassed, and discouraged. My emotions resulted from the tone set and the responses given by my leader.

Most of the times I reported my unit’s maintenance status, my authority figure would end up either interrogating, interrupting, or chastising me in front of my peers. In the rare occurrences that I made it out without questioning or blame, I was witness to another peer casualty being reprimanded without the opportunity to fully explain the situation or seek the assistance needed. 

Over time, my fear and anxiety for these maintenance meetings stifled my curiosity, learning, and overall growth because I simply sought out the critical information that I knew would be most heavily scrutinized. There were also times that I would purposefully not report minor maintenance issues to avoid the retaliation that I knew would come from a longer list of equipment issues.

In the end, both my professional development and my unit’s overall mission readiness were stymied by my superior officer in these meetings. The weekly occurrences drained me of energy, confidence, and the desire to think creatively.

My voice simply did not feel heard. Can you relate?

Psychological Safety 

In another Intentional Leader article, Wes Cochrane described how leadership is a profoundly human endeavor. We’re not dealing with robots - We’re dealing with souls. And all of our souls have truly been tested in recent years. 

From the pandemic, geopolitical instability, and racial/ethnic tension (just to name a few), future uncertainty and fear of the unknown have catalyzed new collective movements in which individuals are seeking safety in a multitude of different ways.

Specifically, organizations across the globe are experiencing seismic shifts in turnover and productivity through the fallout of the Great Resignation and what is now being referred to as “quiet quitting.” While workplace wellness and employee engagement have been topics of discussion for many years prior to the pandemic, another term is being elevated in light of what’s currently at stake in the workforce - psychological safety. 

Originally defined by William Kahn, and more recently developed and expanded upon by Amy Edmondson, psychological safety is “a shared belief that the team is safe for interpersonal risk taking.” For employees, risk taking could mean freely speaking up in meetings, suggesting new ideas or processes, or simply feeling accepted enough to show up to work as their true selves.

This type of security is cultivated through demonstrations of engagement, understanding, and inclusivity. While these types of behaviors are shown in many diverse ways, it is ultimately the leader’s responsibility to not only create, but also maintain, this type of organizational climate.

On the surface, the expression seems to be more of an academic term used by social scientists and psychologists. However, the benefits of high workplace psychological safety speak for themselves through various studies provided by Gallup and Accenture. Workplaces that foster this type of environment in their companies experience many benefits as shown below:

  • 12% increase in productivity

  • 27% reduction in employee turnover

  • 40% decrease in safety incidents

  • 57% rise in workplace collaboration

  • 74% less stress on the job

In a recent study by Google’s People Operations, the human relations team set out to answer the following question: What makes a Google team effective? After over two years and hundreds of Google employee interviews, psychological safety was by far the most dominant finding for overall team dynamics. Other behaviors, such as setting clear goals and reinforcing accountability were important to Googlers, but unless team members felt psychologically safe, the other factors were insufficient. 

With all the brilliant minds and incredible resumes found within Google, the most important factor for driving team performance (as told by employees) was the ability to feel safe taking risks and being able to be vulnerable in front of one another.

So, as we all navigate the new work environment and the many stressors placed on employees both personally and professionally, what steps can we take as leaders to promote and develop psychological safety in our organizations? 

In Amy Edmondson’s book The Fearless Organization, she discusses three interrelated practices for building psychological safety: setting the stage, inviting participation, and responding productively. Let’s take a look at each of these practices more closely to discover practical ways to apply them in the workplace.

Setting the Stage

Setting the stage is critical for framing the work done both within the company and how it is perceived and valued externally by the team and clients. As leaders, we must emphasize the purpose of the operations being executed and for whom it ultimately impacts. While high returns on investment, profit margins, and annual bonuses can speak to employees’ extrinsic motivations, the intrinsic motivations found within mission, meaning, and purpose can galvanize teammates around a shared cause.

Additionally, setting expectations surrounding core values, standards, communication, and interdependence clarify what is most important internally while operating as a team. If employees know what is expected of them and how they contribute to the larger cause, then they will feel more ownership and buy-in towards fully contributing to the collective group. 

The leader must always strive to display these expectations while also communicating grace that is found in the midst of failure. Since many people have natural instincts to avoid failure at all costs, reframing these mishaps as learning opportunities gives workers the freedom to take risks and strive for excellence in their day-to-day tasks and duties.

Leader Action Steps - Setting the Stage

  • Focus on what’s most at stake for your team through your organization's operations.

  • What is your team’s why? What big problems does your company help solve?

  • Set clear expectations around standards, failure, and team collaboration.

  • Be the Chief Reminding Officer by continuing to reinforce these critical points on a consistent basis.

Inviting Participation

The next step in fostering psychological safety in the workplace is inviting participation. Most employees have passionate and innovative thoughts and ideas that could improve the organization. However, the instinctive nature of self-protection can inhibit these ideas from being presented and discussed in environments that feel unsafe. Once again, it’s contingent upon the leader to not only set the stage for openness but also pull these thoughts and ideas out of team members through the power of questions within the appropriate forums and situations.

Amy Edmondson shares three leader tasks that she considers key for inviting participation: demonstrating situational humility, practicing inquiry, and setting up structures and processes. Situational humility allows the leader to acknowledge gaps in their own knowledge or understanding of how problems can be solved in specific situations. By openly addressing the unknown and soliciting feedback, employees feel empowered to present their own views to help fill in the gaps and help the company move forward.

When it comes to practicing inquiry, the leader’s full presence is key. Complete attention shown through body language, active listening, and validating responses give team members the affirmation needed to continue to provide thoughts and opinions knowing that their voice will be welcomed and encouraged for the overall welfare of the organization.

While situational humility and inquiry may commonly take place casually throughout the day through informal conversations, it is also important for leaders to establish formal structures and processes for ideas to be generated, tasks to be documented, and metrics to be tracked. By having consistent and productive meetings in which employees are aware of the agenda and items covered, team members can continue to show up prepared and confident that they can participate in ways that bring value to the group’s strategic goals and objectives.

Leader Action Steps - Inviting Participation 

  • Admit personal mistakes and acknowledge when you simply don’t have the answers.

  • Show curiosity by asking open-ended questions to your team and team members. Be present, demonstrate positive body language, and respond with understanding.

  • Clearly communicate the purpose of set meetings and come prepared with a succinct agenda with known guidelines regarding time, tasks, and communication. 

  • Intentionally allow space for team members to share thoughts and ideas.

Responding Productively

Edmondson's final task for leaders to cultivate psychological safety is responding productively. After inviting participation, the way we respond can express appreciation for our team members’ thoughts, ideas, and opinions. After genuinely thanking others for their feedback, leaders can take it a step further by helping brainstorm next steps that will give way towards impactful action for the organization. 

Similar to situational humility, the leader can communicate the need for one or a group of team members to spearhead an initiative that progresses the organization closer to the goals and objectives set. By offering any help needed and responding with trust and permission to take action, the leader accomplishes a collective orientation towards continuous growth and learning for all employees involved in the process. 

At this point, it’s important to point out that psychological safety may be construed as an overly soft expression for allowing everyone to be known, heard, and appreciated regardless of their input. I admit to initially feeling like this all sounds too good to be true and seems challenging to sustain in the workplace filled with problems and different personalities. However, Edmondson argues that psychological safety is not an “anything goes” environment where people are not expected to adhere to standards and meet deadlines. 

The goal of psychological safety is not comfort. Instead, it is an enabler towards openness and candor that, if fostered correctly, can allow teams to thrive with a sense of shared purpose, mutual respect, and awareness of guiding principles and processes.

The key to cultivating this type of work environment is finding the proper balance of psychological safety and overall accountability. 

As seen in the four-quadrant chart below, the top right “Learning Zone” represents the ideal state of team members feeling known and accepted while being held highly accountable for important and purposeful work. When this is accomplished, organizations strive for excellence by working effectively with one another to achieve the mission at hand. 

The other quadrants show the imbalances of these two critical factors that can result in either comfort, anxiety, or even apathy. While every team member shares a certain level of responsibility in promoting psychological safety in the workplace, it is the leader that often sets the tone through Edmondson’s three tasks (setting the stage, inviting participation, and responding productively) while maintaining awareness of the organization’s current state in the midst of changing circumstances. 

Leader Action Steps - Responding Productively

  • Genuinely express appreciation to team members for participation.

  • Give constructive feedback, empower others to take action towards company goals, and open dialogue to drive next steps.

  • Ensure standards are known and team members are held accountable for clear violations. Stay true and consistent with how you “Set the Stage.”

  • Maintain awareness of what zone your organization is operating out of and strive for excellence found within the “Learning Zone.”

As I reflect back on my dreadful “Maintenance Monday” meetings, I realize that the Army can be an intimidating place to work considering what is at stake to deploy, fight, and win our nation’s wars. Most organizations do not share this same intense mission. 

However, I do know that most, if not all, teams have an innate desire to win. And leaders must bring out the very best of their team members in order to achieve victory. While winning could look very different for organizations, fostering an environment of psychological safety helps bring uniquely distinct and valuable souls together towards a common cause. In today’s day and age, this type of leadership is much desired and needed in our modern workplace. As leaders, we have a duty and responsibility to genuinely care for our team members and shepherd them to safety so they can operate at their highest potential to make a difference in this world. 

And to me, that sounds a lot like winning. 

Life is short - let’s go make it count!

One last thing…If you’re interested in growing in your leadership practice and being inspired to think differently and unlock greater personal potential, we want to give you a gift. Just click the link below and tell us where to send you 12 Ideas That Will Make You A Better Leader In 2022.


Listen to some of our most popular podcast episodes here!

Help us grow by leaving a rating or review on Apple Podcasts

Help us close the gap in leadership instruction by partnering with us financially at Patreon

Follow us on Facebook or LinkedIn

September 16, 2022 /Cal Walters
psychological safety, culture
Organizational Leadership
Comment

Do You Know How to Engage Your People? 3 Tips and Why They'll Work

June 29, 2022 by Cal Walters in Organizational Leadership

The views expressed in this article and page are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy, position, or endorsement of the US Army JAG Corps, US Army, DoD, or the US Government.

By: Patrick Sandys

When you hear the word “engagement.” What comes to mind?

For most, a ring and a proposal. However, for those of us interested in leadership, engagement is a unique aspiration. Engagement is the measure of employees’ mental and emotional connection to their place of work. In other words, engagement is “the level of an employee’s psychological investment in their organization.”

If that definition is a bit academic, think about the best job you have ever had. What made the job so great? You’ll probably say that it was some combination of the people, work, and leadership. When I had great jobs, I was excited to go to work, be a part of the team, regardless of the workload and time commitment; I was engaged.

Intuitively, leaders understand that an organization cannot succeed and meet its full potential without maximizing “buy-in” from their employees. But it’s not enough to simply increase engagement if you don’t understand why your team is responding to it. By only focusing on how to increase engagement, the benefits of engagement on employees—the “so what”—becomes overlooked.

I offer three ways to increase employee engagement and explain why it will matter to the employees.

Is the Boss Hearing Me?

People want to be heard. Whether it is the political issue de jour or an opinion on weather, look no further than the proliferation of social media and the myriad of statements posted every day about any particular topic. It is human nature to have something to say and to exercise the means to say it. Your employees are no different.

To receive employees’ feedback and opinions, you first need to create a “psychologically safe” environment where employees feel they have a meaningful and “safe” way to voice their opinions (without fear of reprisal). In this environment, leaders are receptive, non-confrontational, and responsive.

Once leaders set the “psychologically safe” environment, the next step is to ensure that employees feel heard, accepted, and valued. This means a leader must always follow up on the feedback they received. When leaders follow up and acknowledge employees’ feedback and opinions, employees feel empowered, it affirms the workplace’s “psychological safety,” and a higher sense of “procedural justice ” will infuse within the organization.

Leaders don’t have to implement every “good idea,” but they must respond. In fact, studies have repeatedly shown that soliciting feedback, meaningfully acknowledging the information received, and then providing an explanation for why the ultimate decision was made increases engagement among employees regardless of whether the final decision implemented the suggestion.

Though, like most leadership skills, leaders must learn to provide the environment for their employees to meaningfully voice their opinions, without getting inundated or overwhelmed, and be thoughtful in knowing how and when to respond.

And the Credit Goes To…

As a leader, how do you give credit where it’s due?

Admittedly, it is not easy. On one hand, if you set the bar too low, you risk inflating the number of awards or praise you provide, and over time, those recognitions become meaningless. Alternatively, withholding praise could lead to disgruntled employees, who feel underappreciated. There is the additional concern of ensuring you are recognizing the right people, which can be difficult if your employees work in teams.

To find the best balance, I recommend taking a page from the military. The Army has a tiered approach to awards and recognition. By creating these differing strata of awards and recognition, the Army has a meaningful way of ensuring individuals are properly recognized for services rendered or achievements accomplished. To reinforce the meaning and prestige of each award, the Army has developed standards by which each award is to be given, creating a relative value for each award and limiting the authority of who can authorize the giving of the award. Although the Army is not perfect in its practice and implementation of giving awards and recognition, the concept is one to be emulated.

A similarly important consideration is finding a method of identifying who should be recognized. There are times when wrong people are recognized for someone else’s hard work. Sometimes it is a “middle manager,” whose team did the lion share of the work and the manager swooped in and took the credit or possibly some level of nepotism is at play. I also know that the perception that gender and racial differences are often identified (rightly or wrongly) as being a determining factor. If any of these concerns arise within a leader’s team, the results can be catastrophic to motivation and engagement.

To defeat these perceptions before they can germinate, leaders must engage with employees to learn who is really putting in the work. Leaders must create an environment of trust and honesty within the organization, such that they are able to keep the pulse of the organization and understand each team member’s contribution to the organization and its mission.

Lastly, do not make recognition about metrics alone. The people who enable the team to thrive are just as important as the individuals who become the face of the final product. The importance of recognizing the right people and sharing their successes with the greater organization illustrates your commitment to them as their leader. It shows that you care and it shows that you are paying attention. Giving awards or simply recognizing the achievements of those whom you lead is the easiest and least utilized means of building engagement. Leaders must be creative in how they recognize their teammates and utilize the tools available to them. Failing to do so will inevitably lead to disengagement, a drop in morale, and a general frustration that can have significant detrimental effects on the organization.

Would you want to work for you?

How do your employees see you? Try closing your eyes and imagine you’re having an out of body experience. Observe your body language and interactions with people, starting the moment you walk into the office. Now ask, would you want to work for you?

Though hackneyed, the idea of “leading by example” is one that should be internalized, analyzed, and adjusted in real time by every leader. For many, leading by example means that you are putting in the extra time and energy every day, staying late, arriving early, and sacrificing your time for others. Without a doubt, there is a time and a place for this type of example setting, but such an approach is a recipe for burnout, and very often detrimental to the organization. Instead, I would argue that a leader’s focus needs to be on setting an example that emphasizes what is most important for the organization and motivates employees to accomplish those goals. Often, one's body language and interactions with employees must be geared towards employee engagement, rather than simply focusing on the bottom line. Ultimately, the work will get done, and it will get done faster and with higher quality, if employees are motivated and engaged.

So how does one become an example that motivates people to work harder, smarter, and with a positive attitude?

You must model the engagement you wish to see and it starts with how you are seen by those around you. Sixty percent of effective communication is one’s body language and appearance. How you present yourself and the way your team sees you approach the work, goes a long way to engage or disengage your people.

If you are a person whose hair is constantly on fire, or has a short temper, you need to recognize that and take measures to control it (one method is to seek feedback, as advocated in the first section above). Alternatively, if you are aloof, or generally disengaged with both your work and your people, that is equally troublesome. Leaders must constantly assess the effect and perceptions of their presence in the office, especially if they want to keep their people engaged.

The goal is always to be, or at a minimum, appear to be, the leader for whom you want to work for. If you can’t embody that, then how can you expect your people to want to work for you, and thus, be engaged in your organization? Aristotle may have put it best, “We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence then, is not an act, but a habit.”

Employee engagement is a priority in leadership practice. To ensure success, leaders need to build feedback loops that allow them to assess and understand what drives their employees and what steps are needed to remedy shortfalls. Have a solid understanding of what is important to your people (and why), and all metrics from happiness to productivity will follow.

If you’re interested in growing in your leadership practice and being inspired to think differently and unlock greater personal potential, we want to give you a gift. Just click the link below and tell us where to send you 12 Ideas That Will Make You A Better Leader In 2022.


Patrick Sandys is a compassionate leader, educator, attorney, and mentor. Pat’s primary legal focus has been military justice, having spent years as a prosecutor, defense attorney, and special victim’s counsel. He is now the Command Judge Advocate for the 94th Army Air and Missile Defense Command on Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hick, Hawaii. Before moving to Hawaii, Pat spent a year developing and teaching leadership as the Deputy Director of the Leadership Center at The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School in Charlottesville, VA.

Pat is a graduate of Brown University and the University of San Francisco School of Law. A student of American History, when Pat is not reading the memoirs of President Ulysses S. Grant or the fight for Women’s Suffrage, he is finding his way to the ocean with his two beautiful children and his wife, Pearl.


Listen to some of our most popular podcast episodes here!

Help us grow by leaving a rating or review on Apple Podcasts

Help us close the gap in leadership instruction by partnering with us financially at Patreon

Follow us on Facebook or LinkedIn

June 29, 2022 /Cal Walters
engagement, psychological safety, culture, feedback, recognition
Organizational Leadership
Comment

Photo by Tamara Gak on Unsplash

Does your Team Suck at Workplace Conflict?

June 15, 2022 by Cal Walters in Organizational Leadership

By: Wes Cochrane

Back in late 2012, in the mountains of eastern Afghanistan, in the shadows of the Pakistan border, at a remote U.S. combat outpost, a simmering workplace conflict was about to reach a boil – and I was the culprit.

I’ve only written about this story one other time. I penned a 2016 article, anonymously, for Rob Shaul’s website – Mountain Tactical Institute. 

I was a handful of months into a new job as the Executive Officer for an Infantry Company. Not unlike a mini Chief Operating Officer, my role was to oversee company operations like: logistical support, vehicle maintenance, and stockpiling of critical supplies. Also, I stood ready to command the company in the absence of the Company Commander (an officer that outranked me). 

The problem was that in those first four to five months on the job, I didn’t have a grasp on any of this. I had no idea what I was doing. Four years at West Point, sixteen weeks at the Infantry Officer Basic Course, two months at Ranger School, and a year of leading a rifle platoon had all made me fairly competent at being a Platoon Leader. Unfortunately, I had no idea how to add value as a Company Executive Officer when I stepped into that new role.

None of this would have been problematic if I’d just asked some pretty experienced people around me for help. But, I didn’t.

To my colleagues – especially our company First Sergeant, who was the senior Non-Commissioned Officer in the rifle company and principal advisor to my Company Commander – the cracks showed. Early on, my First Sergeant (a decorated and experienced soldier and keen leader) realized I was struggling. 

He started by asking questions of me. Many questions. 

Regrettably, I chafed at his questions and interpreted them as “sharpshooting me” or harshly nitpicking. I was a fool, who thought himself the victim of an overbearing colleague. I lacked the humility to see that he was trying to help me. All the while, I grew increasingly stressed and concerned that I was failing my company.

It didn’t take long for this to drive a wedge between us. I’ll never know how much consternation I caused my First Sergeant or how much of a distraction I was to my commander in those early months. 

That said, things came to a head in late 2012 inside our company's tactical operations center (TOC; think command and control room). I can’t even tell you what provoked the explosion, but I had pressed one too many buttons, and my First Sergeant finally couldn’t contain his anger. 

He took me to task publicly. 

I didn’t relent. Instead, I doubled down and responded dismissively or arrogantly, prompting him to storm out of the TOC and leave me to face the embarrassment of a public scuffle. 

My commander, to his credit, never [visibly] took sides. He immediately called us into his office and urged us to resolve our conflict. You didn’t need a Ph.D. in psychology to conclude that I was at fault. 

Finally humbled, I apologized profusely. It was exactly what the situation needed. We needed a relief valve to open and unleash months of pent-up pressure. This come-to-Jesus meeting with my First Sergeant was the turnaround point in what proved to be a strong personal and professional relationship. Again, you can read more about it here.

It’s easy to forget that military units, despite their unique missions, share many common denominators with civilian organizations. Workplace conflict takes its toll in both worlds.

Workplace conflict is sapping our organizational strength week after week

Workplace conflict is ubiquitous. A 2008 global study that researched data from nine separate countries, from Europe to the Americas, questioned 5,000 full-time employees and found that employees spend 2.1 hours per week, on average, dealing with workplace conflict. For the United States, that number was even higher at 2.8 hours per week. 

That’s more than an entire work-day per month…spent managing conflict.

I’d venture that most readers’ anecdotal experiences back these statistics up. If anything, for some, 2.8 hours per week navigating workplace conflict may strike them as an underestimate. 

The negative impacts of this reality are self-evident. Players have to take their eyes off the ball as they deal with office tension, drama, and politics. Teams suffer the double whammy of delays in reaching their goals or benchmarks and the drain on their energy and resources as they battle what author Liz Wiseman refers to as the “phantom workload” or “ambient problems.” 

In her book, Impact Players, Wiseman describes ambient problems as “the non-glaring, low-grade issues where the status quo is suboptimal but tolerable.” She points out that “[m]ost people learn to live with these problems, but ambient problems erode performance over time. They are particularly damaging because they are easy to ignore.” Wiseman characterizes them as “white noise” in the organization that persists until someone decides to take notice and do something about them.

Lest I contribute to the false notion that conflict, in and of itself, is a bad thing, let’s get something straight – conflict is a necessity; how leaders and organizations handle it makes all the difference.

We need to embrace conflict and leverage the conflict continuum

A leading voice in the organizational health movement, author and leadership consultant Pat Lencioni, writes and teaches on the concept of the conflict continuum. 

Lencioni describes two ends of a spectrum. On the one hand is what he refers to as “artificial harmony.” Artificial harmony is a state of no conflict. People seem to be getting along, but they’re not truly being honest with each other. On the other end of the spectrum is negative, mean spirited, harsh conflict – really, a living hell. Lencioni describes this as “destructive conflict.”

According to Lencioni, most teams and organizations dwell on the artificial harmony side of the spectrum, afraid that any step toward the destructive end would be hell. 

The result is that the vast majority of organizations have too little conflict.

Predictably, Lencioni teaches teams to search for a sweet spot – move further away from artificial harmony, closer to the other side, right up to the point where another step in that direction would be to tread into destructive conflict. 

Great teams, he says, move toward constructive conflict. Inevitably they sometimes stray into destructive conflict, but they courageously recover and return to the sweet spot.

The leaders and players on those teams know how to own their mistakes. They know how to apologize sincerely and quickly. They know how to swallow their pride and ask for help.

This is actually a hallmark of what Lencioni and his team teach – cultivate conflict around ideas, not people, and do so quickly! Better to get to the heart of an issue or disagreement so you can adjust and move in a more efficient or productive direction. When done well, conflict can be a bridge to success. When done poorly, conflict drains your organization and contributes to the depressing stats about the phantom workload and the ambient problems that Liz Wiseman warns of. 

We don’t need to be stuck with the status quo

Whether we’re in a formal leadership position or not, all of us can benefit from understanding how to navigate conflict in a productive way. There is no reason that we need to trudge through an average of 2.8 hours of exhausting workplace conflict per week. 

My experience contributing to that sort of workplace conflict back in 2012 was a painful one. While it was nearly a decade ago, I’m still embarrassed by that professional failure. However, constructive conflict saved the day and turned things around. My commander had the presence of mind to handle the distracting workplace drama with maturity. My First Sergeant had enough patience to speak truth to me and give me a chance to respond, even though I hadn’t given him much reason to believe I’d handle his feedback like an adult. Those first five months in a challenging new job still remain a powerful cautionary tale to me as I not only lead myself but continue to lead teams. 

Questions for You

  1. What conflict is simmering in your organization or team right now? As a leader or player on that team, what will you do about resolving it this week? 


  2. What side of the conflict continuum would you locate your team on? What dynamic, if any, needs to change to get to the sweet spot?

Leave a comment below and let us know what has worked for you and your team in cultivating a healthy approach to workplace conflict.

One last thing…If you’re interested in growing in your leadership practice and being inspired to think differently and unlock greater personal potential, we want to give you a gift. Just click the link below and tell us where to send you 12 Ideas That Will Make You A Better Leader In 2022.


Listen to some of our most popular podcast episodes here!

Help us grow by leaving a rating or review on Apple Podcasts

Help us close the gap in leadership instruction by partnering with us financially at Patreon

Follow us on Facebook or LinkedIn

June 15, 2022 /Cal Walters
conflict, debate, culture, organizational health
Organizational Leadership
1 Comment